Skip to content


Attach… a Link?

I was disappointed when I saw the language that LinkedIn is using to describe the function of adding a link to a status post.  Maybe I’m being nitpicky, but it seems to me that ever since the early days of the interwebs, users have been trained to associate the act of  ”attaching” with FILES.  (Sidebar: is it still funny to say interwebs?)

This label dates all the way back to the early days of Hotmail and AOL.  That’s right, folks — we’re talking about a design pattern that goes all the way back to the pre-Gmail era.

LinkedIn invites uses to "Attach a Link" to their status posts.

How do you feel about LinkedIn’s choice of language?

PS – I found this while adding a link to the ‘I Am Here’ Project to my status.  Awesome project; awesome folks behind it.

See also

  1. Design Pattern Libraries
  2. Setting User Expectations for Video Using Thumbnails
  3. Getting the most from developers

Posted in Design Critique, Design Patterns.

Tagged with , , , , , .


One Response

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

Continuing the Discussion

  1. The Right Way to a Introduce a New Feature | Erin Lynn Young's UX Design Blog linked to this post on January 27, 2011

    [...] been critical of LinkedIn’s design choices in the past, but the truth is that they provide lots of fodder for critique because they are [...]



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.